Faith in God is Rational, Atheism is Irrational…

The fact that objects move means they had to be put in motion. That fact that objects exist means they had to be created. The premise of atheism is based on I cant see God and therefore there is no God. So how does science explain the existence of the universe. Energy somehow formed out of nothing and contracted into a hot mass of matter the size of a basketball. It had a high temperature of a gazillion degrees or so and it exploded with the power of a gazillion nuclear bombs resulting in after billions of years of cooling down the current state of the universe. Somehow atheists have taken this explanation as rational which i have always thought as irrational. Now science is developing a knew construct that attempts to explain consciousness which seems to originate from the Matrix series. In this relatively new theory objects we see are imagined in our minds as representations of a different reality. So then are we to assume the Big Bang is also a representation in our minds of something else even though we weren’t around when it happened? These 2 ideas have a conflict within both their premises so to think they can coexist and be scientific would be irrational. The premise of believing the creationist model only sounds irrational to someone who doesnt believe that. Atheism to be rational has to keep changing the rules of science to make their beliefs work in their minds which is irrational. To believe in God seems rational when you compare how atheists have to jump through all kinds of hoops to explain God away…

LINK TO ARTICLE